11 ans de fabrication de piles au lithium

Selecting the Right Charge Voltage for Your LiPo Battery (2025): Standard vs. High‑Voltage LiPo

Image de Mari Chen

Mari Chen

Bonjour à tous, je suis Mari Chen, une créatrice de contenu qui a été profondément impliquée dans l'industrie des piles au lithium et la responsable du contenu de yungbang . Ici, je vous emmène dans le brouillard technique des piles au lithium - de l'innovation des matériaux en laboratoire à la sélection des piles pour le consommateur ; de la recherche et du développement de pointe sur les piles aux directives de sécurité pour l'utilisation quotidienne. Je veux être le "traducteur le plus compétent" entre vous et le monde des piles au lithium.

Partager :

Paragraphes

Cover image comparing Standard LiPo (4.20V) vs LiHV (4.35V) charge voltages with safety and balance charging icons.

Choosing the correct per‑cell charge voltage isn’t just a settings tweak—it fundamentally affects performance, cycle life, safety, and charger compatibility. This guide compares Standard LiPo (3.7V nominal, 4.20V max per cell) with High‑Voltage LiPo/LiHV (~3.8V nominal, 4.35V max per cell) and helps you select an appropriate charge voltage for your mission profile.


Quick‑reference: per‑cell voltages and what they mean

ParamètresStandard LiPoLiHV (High‑Voltage LiPo)
Nominal voltage3.7 V≈3.8 V
Max charge voltage4.20 V4.35 V (check datasheet)
Typical storage voltage~3.7–3.85 V~3.7–3.85 V
Absolute minimum (avoid deep discharge)~3.0 V~3.0 V (some users set higher practical cutoffs)

Why charge voltage selection matters


Deep dive: Standard LiPo vs. LiHV

1) Electrical characteristics and real‑world behavior

  • Standard LiPo: 3.7V nominal chemistry, typically charged to 4.20V per cell. Discharging below ~3.0V/cell risks damage; many users set conservative cutoffs around 3.2–3.3V to preserve health. See Grepow’s LiPo voltage explainer (2025).
  • LiHV: ~3.8V nominal chemistry designed for a higher upper limit—most commonly 4.35V per cell. Some devices cap at 4.30V for conservatism; verify with the cell/pack datasheet. Representative OEM pages confirm 4.35V Li‑polymer variants, such as Motoma’s 4.35V high‑voltage Li‑polymer products.

What you’ll feel in use:

  • LiHV charged to 4.35V starts higher on the discharge curve, giving more initial headroom and often better punch. Community tests and vendor analyses consistently frame the gain in the single‑digit to low‑double‑digit percent range for energy, e.g., the Chinahobbyline comparison et Oscar Liang’s guide.

2) Performance vs. longevity trade‑offs

  • Charging higher yields more energy but shortens life; partial‑charging helps. Battery University’s longitudinal data indicate that for lithium‑ion chemistries, reducing the top‑off voltage markedly extends cycle life, with examples showing large gains when charging to ~4.10V instead of 4.20V, and even more when going lower—at the cost of capacity, per BU‑808 (2023–2025).
  • Practical use:
    • Standard LiPo: Consider charging to 4.10–4.15V for longevity‑first deployments.
    • LiHV: You can purposely undercharge to 4.20V to extend life while still using LiHV packs (useful if your charger lacks LiHV mode or you need longer cycle life). This approach is discussed in the Grepow LiHV overview (2025) and hobby guides like Oscar Liang.

3) Safety profile and common pitfalls

  • Never charge a standard LiPo above 4.20V. Doing so is an overcharge condition and elevates risk.
  • Always balance‑charge multi‑cell packs to keep cell voltages aligned; institutional safety materials emphasize supervised charging and proper equipment, such as the University of Illinois battery charging guidance (PDF).
  • Storage around ~3.7–3.85V/cell reduces stress and swelling during idle periods, a practice aligned with lithium‑ion longevity insights in Battery University BU‑808 (2023–2025).

Safety callout: Charge at room temperature on a non‑flammable surface, stay within rated C‑rates, never leave charging unattended, retire swollen/damaged packs, and use fire‑resistant bags/boxes for charging and storage.

4) Charger ecosystem and setup

5) Compliance, transport, and documentation

If you’re an OEM or shipping batteries, your selection may also be guided by certification and logistics:

  • UN38.3 transport testing is required for legal shipment of cells/packs; IEC 62133‑2 and UL standards address product safety. Summaries and compliance overviews are widely referenced by industry and labs.
  • For air transport, the International Air Transport Association’s 2025 documents outline packing instructions and state‑of‑charge limitations for many categories; see the IATA Lithium Battery Guidance Document (2025) and the IATA DGR 66th Edition addendum (2025).

6) Cost and availability context

LiHV packs are widely available in RC/FPV markets (e.g., CNHL and others), often with a small premium versus similar LiPo packs. Selection varies by region and brand; comparative pricing changes frequently. For practical performance commentary, see vendor and community analyses like Chinahobbyline’s LiHV vs. LiPo article.


Scenario‑based recommendations

  • Maximum performance (FPV racing/RC competition)

    • Choose LiHV and charge to 4.35V when allowed by the pack spec and charger. Expect better punch and a modest energy boost, with shorter cycle life. Follow strict charging discipline and temperature management, as discussed in the Oscar Liang LiHV guide.
  • Balanced everyday use (general drones/RC)

    • Either chemistry works. Consider partial‑charging for life extension: Standard LiPo at ~4.10–4.20V, or LiHV at 4.20V if you don’t need peak performance every flight. See the longevity trade‑offs in Battery University BU‑808 (2023–2025).
  • Longevity‑first (embedded/industrial devices)

    • Standard LiPo with conservative upper cutoffs (~4.10–4.15V), robust thermal control, and an appropriate BMS is often the pragmatic choice. Confirm standards and transport compliance and design for safe charge/discharge margins; refer to IATA’s 2025 lithium battery guidance for shipping considerations.
  • Thermal constraints (very hot or cold environments)

    • Regardless of chemistry, avoid charging when cells are too cold or hot; consider derating charge voltage and current, and allow temperature conditioning. Conservative top voltages generally reduce stress per BU‑808 (2023–2025).
  • Charger‑limited users


Practical setup: get your charging right

  • Set the correct chemistry profile per pack:
    • Standard LiPo → 4.20V/cell max
    • LiHV → 4.35V/cell max (only if the pack is rated for it)
  • Always balance‑charge multi‑cell packs.
  • Partial‑charge for longevity when appropriate: 4.10–4.15V can yield meaningful life extensions in many lithium‑ion systems per BU‑808 (2023–2025).
  • Storage: Rest to ~3.7–3.85V/cell if you won’t use the pack soon; check again after a few weeks.
  • Supervision and safety: Charge on a fire‑resistant surface, in a LiPo bag/box, never unattended; retire swollen/damaged packs following lab‑style precautions like those in the University of Illinois battery charging guide (PDF).

FAQ

  • Can I charge LiHV with a standard LiPo charger?

  • What happens if I charge a standard LiPo to 4.35V?

  • Is LiHV always better for performance?

    • LiHV gives a higher starting voltage and often modest energy/power gains when fully charged to 4.35V, but at the cost of cycle life. Contextual comparisons by practitioners, including the Chinahobbyline article et Oscar Liang’s guide, frame the typical gain around 5–10% energy depending on pack and conditions.
  • What storage voltage should I use?

  • I see some mentions of 4.30V LiHV—what’s that?

    • Some devices or users cap LiHV charging at 4.30V for conservatism or due to device limits. Many OEM LiHV cells are specified for 4.35V; always follow the pack’s datasheet. A representative example confirming 4.35V chemistry is Motoma’s high‑voltage Li‑polymer product page.

Decision checklist

  • What’s your mission profile?
    • Maximum punch and shortest races → LiHV at 4.35V (with strict safety discipline)
    • Everyday flying/driving → Either; consider partial‑charging for longer life
    • Embedded/industrial → Standard LiPo with conservative top voltage, robust BMS
  • Does your charger support LiHV mode (4.35V/cell) and balancing?
  • What are your thermal constraints (charging/operating temps)?
  • Do you have compliance/shipping needs (UN38.3, IEC 62133‑2, IATA rules)?
  • Are you willing to accept shorter cycle life for extra performance?

Also consider: OEM/ODM battery solutions

If you’re an engineer or buyer needing custom packs, BMS design, or certification pathways, you may evaluate suppliers. One example is Yungbang Power(永邦电源), a manufacturer offering Li‑polymer and Li‑ion packs, custom battery design, BMS integration, and support for certifications such as ISO9001/14001 and common market approvals. Disclosure: Yungbang Power is our product.


Bottom line

  • There’s no universal “winner.”
  • Choose LiHV charged to 4.35V when you prioritize peak performance and accept a shorter service life.
  • Choose standard LiPo—and/or partial‑charge either chemistry—when longevity, safety margin, and predictable field reliability matter most.
  • Above all, match the charger profile to the chemistry, balance‑charge, manage temperature, and follow transport/safety rules.

References (selected, as of 2025)