If you’ve ever wondered why the same “capacity” number on two batteries can deliver very different runtime, weight, or safety behavior, this comparison is for you. Below, we translate the core specifications—energy density, C‑rate, self‑discharge, nominal voltage, internal resistance, and more—into practical outcomes for product design and procurement. We also call out test conditions (temperature, depth of discharge) and the critical differences between cell‑level data and pack‑level performance.
Ordering note: We compare chemistries (Li‑ion and NiMH) alphabetically and give scenario‑based recommendations—there’s no single winner for every use case.
What the headline specs really mean
Before diving into numbers, it helps to align on assumptions. Most published specs reflect cell‑level measurements near room temperature (~20–25°C), at modest discharge rates (≈0.2–1C). Pack‑level performance will be lower due to interconnects, thermal limits, and protections.
- Energy density (Wh/kg, Wh/L): Determines how much energy you can store for a given weight or volume—crucial for mobile devices and anything size/weight constrained.
- Specific power (W/kg): Indicates how quickly energy can be delivered—important for power tools and hybrid vehicles.
- Self‑discharge (%/month): Affects standby readiness; high self‑discharge drains devices between uses.
- C‑rate and charge protocol: Governs how fast you can charge/discharge without damaging cells.
- Nominal voltage: Impacts series cell counts, converter design, and efficiency.
- Internal resistance/impedance: Drives voltage sag and heat under load; higher resistance typically means poorer high‑current performance.
- Cycle life to 80% capacity: A function of chemistry, depth of discharge (DoD), temperature, and charge regime.
Core differences, with evidence
- Energy density: In 2024, the International Energy Agency reported Li‑ion cells around 150–270+ Wh/kg (chemistry‑dependent) versus NiMH at roughly 60–120 Wh/kg; volumetric density follows a similar pattern. See the IEA’s 2024 report Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions for the underlying ranges and context (IEA 2024 batteries report).
- Specific power: High‑power Li‑ion variants routinely exceed ~200 W/kg, with specialized cells higher; NiMH typically sits ~100–200 W/kg depending on design. A 2023 analysis of lithium cell behavior provides representative power characteristics at practical C‑rates (Nature Communications 2023 lithium cell analysis).
- Self‑discharge: Li‑ion’s monthly self‑discharge is generally ~2–3% at room temperature, while standard NiMH can reach ~15–25% per month; low self‑discharge (LSD) NiMH reduces that substantially. The University of Washington’s Clean Energy Institute explains Li‑ion’s low self‑discharge mechanisms and storage guidance (UW Clean Energy Institute overview of Li‑ion).
- Nominal voltage: Li‑ion cells are ~3.6–3.7 V (NMC/NCA) or ~3.2 V (LFP) versus 1.2 V for NiMH, which affects series counts, converter choices, efficiency, and pack complexity. Foundational NiMH design considerations are summarized in the long‑standing engineering notes at Powerstream (Powerstream NiMH design basics).
- Memory effect and maintenance: Modern NiMH exhibits far less “memory” than NiCd but can still show voltage depression with repeated shallow cycling; proper chargers with −ΔV termination help. Li‑ion has no memory effect but is sensitive to high‑voltage storage and elevated temperatures (see UW CEI link above); NiMH maintenance guidance is outlined by Powerstream.
- Real product example (LSD NiMH): Panasonic’s Eneloop Pro AA (BK‑3HCCE) is specified for high capacity with retention claims such as ~85% after one year at 20°C, illustrating what “LSD NiMH” means in practice (Panasonic, product page 2025: Eneloop Pro BK‑3HCCE specifications).
- Cost per Wh: BloombergNEF reported average Li‑ion pack prices of $139/kWh in 2024 with further declines expected in 2025, reflecting the maturing supply chain and scale effects (BloombergNEF insight, 2024: battery pack prices at $139/kWh). Retail $/Wh varies widely by form factor and brand; OEM pricing differs from consumer retail.
- Safety and transport: Portable Li‑ion packs require robust protection (BMS) and must pass transport tests under UN 38.3 (altitude, vibration, shock, thermal, external short, overcharge, forced discharge). The official UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Section 38.3, outlines the test regimen (UNECE, current edition: UN 38.3 transport tests). NiMH is more tolerant of abuse but still benefits from temperature and charge control.
Small comparison table (cell‑level, typical ranges at ~20–25°C)
| Spec | Lithium‑Ion (Li‑ion) | Nickel‑Metal Hydride (NiMH) |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal voltage | ~3.6–3.7 V (NMC/NCA); ~3.2 V (LFP) | ~1.2 V |
| Densité énergétique | ~150–270+ Wh/kg; ~300–650+ Wh/L | ~60–120 Wh/kg; ~140–300 Wh/L |
| Specific power | ~200–300+ W/kg (model‑dependent) | ~100–200 W/kg |
| Self‑discharge | ~2–3%/month | ~15–25%/month (LSD much lower) |
| Typical charge | CC/CV, 0.5–1C | Constant current, −ΔV or temp/time cutoff, 0.1–1C (fast up to ~2C) |
| Typical discharge | 1–3C; high‑power up to ~10C | Up to ~5C (design‑dependent) |
| Cycle life to ~80% | ~500–2,000+ (chemistry & DoD dependent; LFP higher) | ~300–1,000 (LSD optimized for retention) |
| Operating temp (discharge) | ≈ −20 to 60°C (charge ≥0°C) | ≈ −20 to 50–60°C (charge ≥0°C) |
| Safety/abuse tolerance | Needs BMS; thermal runaway risk under abuse | More forgiving; venting without fire more common |
| Cost trajectory | Declining $/Wh with scale | Stable/less favorable on $/Wh vs Li‑ion |
Notes: Values are indicative; always consult the exact datasheet and test under your use conditions.
Cell‑level specs vs pack‑level reality
- Expect lower usable capacity and power at the pack level. Interconnect resistance, thermal throttling, and BMS limits all reduce the maxima implied by single‑cell figures.
- Voltage architecture: A Li‑ion pack often needs fewer series cells than a NiMH pack to achieve the same bus voltage. Fewer cells can reduce balancing/monitoring complexity, but Li‑ion requires more sophisticated BMS logic for protections (OV/UV/OC/OT, cell balancing, fault handling).
- Thermal design: Li‑ion energy density concentrates heat; ensure adequate heat paths, sensors, and derating. NiMH can tolerate some abuse but will age quickly at elevated temperatures and during high‑current trickle.
How each spec affects your design
- Weight/volume: Li‑ion’s higher energy density means smaller, lighter packs for the same runtime—critical for drones, wearables, and handhelds.
- Runtime and surge power: Li‑ion’s specific power and lower internal resistance minimize voltage sag during bursts; NiMH can deliver respectable bursts but heats up faster.
- Standby readiness: NiMH’s higher self‑discharge (unless using LSD types) can leave seldom‑used devices depleted. Li‑ion is better for emergency kits and intermittent‑use gear—provided storage voltage and temperature are managed.
- Charging experience: Li‑ion supports fast charging via CC/CV with tight voltage control; NiMH fast‑charge is feasible but requires reliable −ΔV/temperature detection and good thermal management.
- Safety engineering: Li‑ion packs are unforgiving to overcharge and deep undervoltage; protections and compliance testing are mandatory. NiMH is less energy‑dense and often fails more benignly, but improper charging can still cause venting and capacity loss.
- Total cost of ownership: Even if cell pricing looks similar on paper, Li‑ion’s higher Wh/kg can lower system‑level costs (smaller enclosures, fewer cells, less weight). Conversely, in AA/AAA ecosystems, high‑quality LSD NiMH may be the most practical and economical choice.
Application fit: where each chemistry makes sense
- Consumer electronics (phones, laptops, tablets, cameras): Almost universally Li‑ion due to energy density, charge convenience, and low self‑discharge (IEA 2024 reference above).
- Power tools: Performance‑oriented designs favor Li‑ion (NMC/NCA; some LFP) for high power and fast charging. Budget tools can still use NiMH, accepting heavier packs and shorter runtime.
- Hybrid vehicles (HEVs): NiMH remains in some HEVs for robustness and cost‑predictability; many newer HEVs have shifted to Li‑ion for efficiency and weight (IEA 2024 reference above).
- Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and stationary storage: Li‑ion dominates; LFP is increasingly popular for safety, cost, and long life (IEA 2024 reference above).
- UPS/backup and energy storage: LFP Li‑ion is common for long cycle life and safety; NiMH is rare in large stationary systems.
- AA/AAA form‑factor devices (flashes, remotes, toys): LSD NiMH (e.g., Eneloop) is reliable, safe, and straightforward; Li‑ion “AA” with built‑in converters exists but is less standardized and may complicate charger compatibility.
- Harsh/high‑temperature environments: NiMH can be more forgiving under heat and abuse; LFP Li‑ion with conservative C‑rates and robust thermal design is a strong alternative.
Safety, standards, and compliance checklist
- Design for the worst case: plan for over‑current, cell imbalance, high delta‑T, and ambient heat.
- Use a BMS for Li‑ion with: per‑cell voltage monitoring, current limits, temperature sensing, balancing, and fault handling. Ensure pack design enables compliance testing.
- Know your tests and standards: IEC 62133 (portable cells/packs), UL 1642/2054 (cells/packs), and UN 38.3 for transport. The UNECE UN 38.3 reference above outlines what shipping compliance entails.
- Document assumptions: operating temperature range, charge rates, acceptable DoD, and expected cycle life.
Scenario‑based recommendations
- Weight/volume constrained (drones, wearables, medical portables): Favor Li‑ion (often NMC/NCA). If added thermal margin and life are needed with a modest energy density tradeoff, evaluate LFP.
- Standby/low‑use devices (emergency kits, flashlights, sensors): Favor Li‑ion for low self‑discharge and stable shelf life; if AA/AAA format is required, choose LSD NiMH and a smart charger.
- High‑temp or abuse‑tolerant contexts (outdoor instrumentation, some industrial tools): NiMH is robust and predictable; LFP Li‑ion is viable with conservative charge/discharge rates and meticulous thermal management.
- Hybrid vehicles and power‑burst profiles: NiMH remains serviceable; Li‑ion improves weight/volume and often efficiency in newer platforms.
- Budget‑sensitive, moderate performance (toys, basic tools, consumer gadgets using standard cell sizes): LSD NiMH is simple and safe; Li‑ion yields better performance per Wh when charging infrastructure and protections are in place.
Choosing between Li‑ion and NiMH: a quick decision path
- Is your design weight or volume constrained?
- Yes: Li‑ion.
- No: Go to 2.
- Do you need long standby life with minimal maintenance?
- Yes: Li‑ion or LSD NiMH (if AA/AAA required).
- No: Go to 3.
- Will the device face high ambient heat or frequent abuse?
- Yes: NiMH or LFP Li‑ion with derating and strong thermal design.
- No: Go to 4.
- Is fast charging and high surge power important?
- Yes: Li‑ion.
- No: Either, based on ecosystem (AA/AAA → NiMH; custom pack → Li‑ion).
Also consider: a Li‑ion manufacturing partner (neutral mention)
For teams planning custom Li‑ion packs with BMS integration and certification needs, you may evaluate suppliers with proven cell sourcing, pack engineering, and compliance experience such as Yungbang Power（永邦电源）. Disclosure: Yungbang Power is our product.
FAQs
- Why does my NiMH device feel “weaker” even when cells are charged?
- NiMH has lower nominal voltage (1.2 V) and higher internal resistance; at high loads, voltage sag can trip device cutoffs. Quality LSD cells and an appropriate charger help.
- Can I replace a NiMH pack with Li‑ion to save weight?
- Possibly, but you must redesign the voltage architecture, protections, and charging. Li‑ion requires a proper BMS and compliance testing (UN 38.3 for shipping, plus IEC/UL safety).
- Is LFP always better than NMC/NCA for safety?
- LFP is generally more thermally stable, but system‑level safety depends on cell quality, mechanical design, BMS, and thermal management.
Citations and further reading
- Energy density, market context (IEA, 2024): IEA 2024 batteries report
- Power characteristics and degradation mechanisms (Nature Communications, 2023): Nature Communications 2023 lithium cell analysis
- Li‑ion fundamentals and self‑discharge (UW CEI): UW Clean Energy Institute overview of Li‑ion
- NiMH design/charging fundamentals (Powerstream): Powerstream NiMH design basics
- LSD NiMH product example (Panasonic, 2025): Eneloop Pro BK‑3HCCE specifications
- Li‑ion pack pricing trend (BloombergNEF, 2024): battery pack prices at $139/kWh
- Transport compliance (UNECE): UN 38.3 transport tests
EN 
ES 
FR 
DE 
RU 
ZH