11 years of lithium battery manufacturer

Understanding LiPo Battery Hazards: Prevention, Recognition, and Emergency Response Protocols

Picture of Mari Chen

Mari Chen

Hello everyone, I am Mari Chen, a content creator who has been deeply involved in the lithium battery industry and the chief content officer of yungbang . Here, I will take you through the technical fog of lithium batteries - from material innovation in the laboratory to battery selection on the consumer side; from cutting-edge battery research and development to safety guidelines for daily use. I want to be the "most knowledgeable translator" between you and the world of lithium batteries.

Share :

Paragraph Topics

Factory LiPo battery safety: supervised charging room, DDR bin, dual-class extinguishers, and early detection monitoring.

If you work with lithium polymer (LiPo) or other lithium‑ion packs, you already know the stakes: thermal runaway can escalate in seconds, off‑gassing is toxic, and re‑ignition is common without proper cooling and isolation. This guide consolidates field‑tested practices and 2025–2026 regulatory updates into concrete SOPs you can implement across manufacturing floors, warehouses, and supervised charging rooms.

I’ve led EHS programs through audits and real incidents. What follows are the prevention controls, recognition cues, and response steps that consistently reduce risk—paired with the exact standards and agency guidance you’ll be asked to show during inspections.


1) Prevention: Engineering your environment to avoid incidents

Prevention is a layer cake: energy control, environment control, segregation, supervision, and early detection. Each layer buys time and reduces severity if something goes wrong.

  • Control stored energy (SoC) for warehousing.
    • Keep inventory at a partial state of charge for storage; many programs align with the aviation baseline of about 30% SoC for risk reduction. While aviation rules govern transport, the practice of reduced SoC in storage is consistent with conservative programs and upcoming air rules clarifying SoC limits in 2025–2026 under IATA/ICAO lithium battery provisions. See the 2025 IATA lithium battery guidance and the ICAO 2025–2026 Technical Instructions revisions on SoC scope and packing instructions updates: IATA Lithium Battery Guidance (2025) and ICAO TI 2025–2026 Revisions.
  • Stabilize the environment (temperature, ventilation, and egress).
  • Segregate risk—especially DDR (damaged/defective/recalled).
    • Separate DDR immediately into a restricted area, using non‑combustible, non‑conductive containers with absorbent medium (e.g., vermiculite or sand). DOT’s §173.185(f) prescribes individual non‑metallic inners, non‑combustible/non‑conductive cushioning, and PG I‑rated outers for shipment of DDR. See PHMSA’s Lithium Battery Guide for Shippers (2024) and the ERG 2024 initial action guide.
  • Supervise charging and avoid unattended high‑risk activities.
  • Detect early—don’t rely on a single sensor type.
  • Prepare suppression for the hazards you actually face.
    • For facilities with dense Li‑ion storage or ESS, water sprinklers have been shown effective in controlling many scenarios when properly designed; FM Global’s research underscores the need for substantial water application and tailored design. Consult your insurer/engineer; see FM Global’s Sprinklers and ESS research summary and its research reports index.

Common pitfalls to avoid:

  • Treating consumer fire extinguishers as a silver bullet. Clean agents can knock down flames but won’t stop thermal runaway; you still need sustained cooling with water per FAA AC 120‑80B (2024).
  • Mixing DDR with good stock “for later sorting.” This violates segregation principles and can breach DOT/EPA expectations; start DDR isolation and documentation immediately per PHMSA lithium guidance and EPA used Li‑ion battery resources (2025).

2) Recognition: How to spot trouble early (without creating new risks)

Use a “no‑touch until PPE is on” rule. Quick cues I train teams to look for:

  • Visual: swelling/pouching; discoloration; venting; melting shrink; smoke vapor.
  • Auditory/olfactory: hissing or popping; solvent‑like sweet/metallic odors—assume toxic off‑gas including HF.
  • Thermal: unusual warmth vs. neighbors; localized hot spot on IR.
  • Telemetry: BMS flags—cell imbalance, rising internal resistance, abnormal charge acceptance.

Before approaching:

  • Don eye/face protection and heat‑resistant gloves; consider FR clothing. Employers must assess hazards and provide PPE and training per OSHA 1910.132 (PPE) and ensure employees are trained on use/limitations.

Triage levels (determine your playbook):

  • Elevated temp or swelling, no flame: proceed with overheating protocol.
  • Visible flame or heavy smoke: execute fire response protocol and evacuate as needed.
  • Confirmed DDR from QA or field return: follow DDR quarantine/pack‑out protocol.

3) Emergency response protocols (role-based, step-by-step)

These steps align with FAA, OSHA, PHMSA, and NFPA research consensus: knock down flames if present, then cool aggressively to prevent re‑ignition; isolate and observe.

A) Overheating without open flame

  1. Announce and cordon: trigger local alarm if escalation is possible; set a hot zone and restrict access per your emergency plan and OSHA alarm requirements.
  2. PPE and detection: don PPE; position IR camera; check for off‑gas readings if sensors are installed.
  3. De‑energize: stop charging; disconnect safely where possible; do not handle swollen packs by hand.
  4. Cool: apply water (mist or gentle stream) to cool the pack and adjacent materials; avoid blasting cells apart. FAA guidance for lithium battery fires emphasizes water cooling for thermal runaway risk; the same cooling logic reduces propagation in overheating events—see FAA AC 120‑80B (2024).
  5. Move to isolation if safe: transfer with tools/tongs to a non‑combustible container with inert absorbent in a ventilated isolation area.
  6. Observe: active monitoring for re‑heating for several hours (up to 24 hours depending on risk) with periodic IR checks. Document the incident.

B) Active fire or venting with flame

  1. Alarm and evacuate near zones: protect egress per OSHA Subpart E. Call emergency responders.
  2. Initial knockdown: use a clean agent (e.g., Halon replacement) or water mist extinguisher to knock down flames, following OSHA 1910.157 portable extinguisher training requirements.
  3. Sustained cooling: switch to copious water to cool the device/battery and any exposures; FAA materials repeatedly stress water is essential to stop propagation and re‑ignition—see FAA PackSafe lithium guidance.
  4. Ventilate/contain off‑gas: use designed ventilation; avoid spreading contaminated air into occupied zones. NFPA’s research arm highlights toxic off‑gassing and HF concerns; see the FPRF landscape of BESS hazards.
  5. Post‑fire isolation and observation: move remains to isolation bins when responders clear the scene; continue IR monitoring and re‑ignition checks.
  6. Decon and medical: perform PPE decontamination; evaluate for inhalation exposure; document per your incident plan.

C) DDR quarantine and pack‑out (on‑site and for shipment)

  1. Identify and tag: mark as DDR with the reason (swollen, overheated, damaged case, failed QC).
  2. Quarantine zone: place in a non‑combustible, non‑conductive, lidded container with absorbent media; restrict access. EPA and DOT emphasize segregation and proper containment; see EPA Used Lithium‑Ion Batteries (2025).
  3. Prepare for shipment per §173.185(f):
    • Individual non‑metallic inner packaging.
    • Non‑combustible, non‑conductive, and absorbent cushioning.
    • Strong PG I performance‑tested outer packaging.
    • Full Class 9 hazard communication unless operating under a Special Permit. Reference: PHMSA Lithium Battery Guide (2024) and example DOT‑SP 21342.
  4. Carrier/recycler coordination: use certified recyclers and carriers; verify UN 38.3 test summary availability for compliant goods and proper DDR documentation for damaged units. UN requirements for testing and documentation are detailed in UN Manual Section 38.3.

4) Transport and shipping compliance (2025–2026)

  • Air transport updates: The 2025 IATA guidance clarifies SoC declarations and packing instructions (PI 965–970) and signals further 2026 changes; operators are increasingly asking for explicit SoC indications and handling notes. See IATA Lithium Battery Guidance (2025) and IATA DGR significant changes, 66th ed. (2025).
  • ICAO TI 2025–2026: Technical revisions extend SoC limits and refine provisions for batteries contained in/with equipment under PI 966/967. Review the ICAO TI 2025–2026 revisions with your shipper’s manual.
  • UN 38.3 testing and documentation: Maintain test summaries, Wh marking, and quality management documentation per the UNECE UN 38.3 manual and 2024–2025 clarifications.
  • Damaged/defective/recalled (DDR): Follow §173.185(f) and use appropriate Special Permits if your packaging deviates. PHMSA’s portal centralizes lithium battery rules and resources—see PHMSA lithium batteries hub.

Practical shipper tips:

  • Add SoC to your Shipper’s Declaration comments where required or requested by operators (per IATA guidance), and align warehouse labels with shipping SoC.
  • Audit your PI 965–970 packaging lines quarterly against the latest IATA addenda and operator bulletins like the IATA DGR 66 Addendum 1.

5) Recycling and environmental management


6) Tools and vendor selection (neutral toolbox)

Disclosure: The following section mentions one of our contributors’ brands for context and parity with peers.

  • Custom cell/pack manufacturers and BMS partners:
    • Yungbang Power(永邦电源) — established 2013; capabilities include Li‑polymer/Li‑ion cells and packs, custom battery design, BMS integration, and high‑volume manufacturing with ISO 9001/14001 systems and international certifications (UL/CE/FCC) per company overview.
    • Panasonic, LG Energy Solution, BYD — established peers with broad UL/IEC certified portfolios and global after‑sales support footprints.

Selection criteria I use in audits:

  • Standards and listings: UL 1642 (cells), UL 2054 or IEC/UL 62133‑2 (packs), documented UN 38.3 test summaries. See UL/IEC overviews for scope and expectations such as UL’s 62133‑2 overview and the UN 38.3 manual.
  • BMS robustness: Overcharge/over‑discharge/over‑current/over‑temp protections with fault logging and accessible telemetry.
  • Data transparency: Clear datasheets (recommended storage temp/SoC, charge regimes), incident reporting process, and change control notices.
  • Support and training: Access to shipping documentation, DDR handling guidance, and operator training aligned with IATA/PHMSA and OSHA.

7) Mini factory scenarios (what works in practice)

  • Scenario 1: Preventing a charging‑room incident

    • Situation: Overnight charge profile drifted after a firmware update; an IR camera flagged a hot spot on one pack.
    • Actions: Supervisor halted charging via remote cutoff, applied water mist cooling, moved the pack to an isolation bin with vermiculite, and logged a DDR tag. Post‑event, engineering rolled back firmware and added BMS alarm thresholds to the SCADA.
    • Why it worked: Early detection plus immediate cooling and isolation. The playbook aligns with FAA’s message that cooling—often with water—is key to preventing propagation, as noted in FAA AC 120‑80B (2024).
  • Scenario 2: Warehouse DDR segregation averts a larger loss

    • Situation: Receiving flagged a swollen pouch cell in a mixed pallet.
    • Actions: Team applied a DDR tag, moved it into a non‑combustible bin with absorbent, and scheduled a same‑day pack‑out under §173.185(f). The rest of the pallet was quarantined for QA.
    • Why it worked: Immediate segregation and correct packaging per PHMSA guidance minimized exposure and maintained shipping compliance. Reference: PHMSA Lithium Battery Guide (2024).

8) Training and role-based checklists

Train to the job, refresh annually, and drill your emergency plan. Core elements:

  • HazCom and SDS briefing for all staff handling batteries (chemical and physical hazards) per OSHA 1910.1200 Hazard Communication.
  • Portable extinguisher use (P.A.S.S., limitations for Li‑ion, transition to water cooling) per OSHA 1910.157.
  • Alarm/egress drills and assembly points per OSHA Subpart E.
  • Shipping/receiving DDR identification and §173.185(f) packaging per PHMSA guidance and your Special Permits, if any.
  • Respiratory protection plan where off‑gas monitoring triggers potential exposure, aligned with OSHA 1910.134 (fit testing, medical evals).

Quick printable checklist (adapt for your site):

  • Storage & charging
    • [ ] SoC labeled on pallets; storage SoC maintained per policy
    • [ ] Temp/humidity within datasheet limits; no heat sources nearby
    • [ ] Charging supervised; detection and suppression in place
    • [ ] DDR container present, labeled, and isolated
  • Recognition cues
    • [ ] Swelling/odor/heat checks in receiving and pre‑charge
    • [ ] IR scan routine for high‑density areas
    • [ ] BMS telemetry alarms integrated to plant alerts
  • Emergency response
    • [ ] Extinguishers accessible; team trained this quarter
    • [ ] Water supply available for sustained cooling
    • [ ] Post‑incident isolation bins and IR monitoring plan
  • Shipping & recycling
    • [ ] UN 38.3 test summaries on file
    • [ ] §173.185(f) DDR kits stocked; Special Permits current
    • [ ] Recycler certificates and EPA guidance posted

9) Governance: keep it current

  • Annual standards review: Track code and guidance updates (NFPA 855, IATA/ICAO, PHMSA/DOT, EPA, OSHA). Start with the NFPA 855 standard page and IATA Lithium Battery Guidance (2025).
  • Conduct joint drills with local responders; share your isolation zones and material safety data.
  • Inspect equipment quarterly: extinguishers, detection sensors, IR cameras, and isolation supplies.

10) Boundaries and trade-offs

  • Separation distances and ventilation for ESS are configuration‑dependent. NFPA 855 relies on UL 9540A test data and system listings; coordinate with your AHJ instead of copying a number from another site. See the NFPA 855 TIA discussing test‑informed controls.
  • Not all chemistries behave the same; FM Global notes that effectiveness of sprinklers and needed application can vary by chemistry and system arrangement—consult insurer engineering and system vendors, referencing the FM Global ESS sprinkler research.

References cited in context


By building these practices into routine operations—energy control, environment stability, segregation, detection, and trained response—you materially cut the likelihood and impact of LiPo incidents. Review your program against the checklists above, update your SOPs to reflect 2025 guidance, and schedule a cross‑functional drill this quarter. Your future self (and your insurer) will thank you.